In the recent Venezuelan parliamentary elections, Hugo Chavez's ruling Movement for the Fifth Republic (MVR) won 114 out of 168 seats, and smaller parties allied to him won the rest. This means that the 'Chavez party' (so to speak) has every single seat in the legislature.
One-party rule isn't something you get in a democracy; that's more like Cuba or China. Although, in those cases the party is the government, rather than the party simply occupying all major positions in the govenrment.
So, how did the chavistas pull of this electoral feat? Simple: they ran unnopposed. All major opposition parties, from the left-leaning Democratic Action to the Christian Democrats to conservative Project Venezuela to libertarian Justice First withdraw from the elections and told people not to vote.
The supposed reason for this was fear of fraud on the part of the Chavez administration. This seems like a shaky argument, as international observors - from the EU and OAS, among others - were invited to oversee the election and ensure that no vote-rigging took place. A more likely explanation is that opposition-conducted opinion polls had shown Chavez and his party with approval ratings above 70% and the opposition with negative ratings nearly as high.
Vcrisis.com declared the election a victory for the opposition before it even took place, reasoning that every non-vote was a de facto vote against Chavez. This might make some sense, if the vast majority of opposition candidates had not been placed on the ballot despite the boycott, allowing for people to vote for them if they wished. Or if many poll workers in upper-class neighborhoods not refused to come in, barring people from voting even if they wanted to.
BUT, someone who doesn't know much about the situation will pick up the newspaper, read that Chavez's party is in total control, and assume that Venezuela is a dictatorship. It's pretty clever, actually.
4 comments:
It's a crazy world. How are you doing L.A?
I miss your comments keeping me honest.
Most people only like the democratic process when they think they can win, otherwise they are quick to scrap it.On the other hand, just because I vote (and usually lose) in US elections does not mean I have much faith in the process to bring about the kind of change I feel is necessary.There are other systemic barricades in place preventing me from building a majority of uncapitalists.
One day when I'm cozy and safe in the northern hemisphere, I'll also go around writing praises to Chavez, Lula, Fidel and others. Meanwhile, I just stand down here horrified, not only at the faux-dictators, but also at the useful idiots.
I don't remember saying anything about Fidel. In fact, in this very post I group Cuba with China in un-democratic countries.
If you don't like Lula, vote against him (since you seem to live in Brazil).
If you don't like Chavez, let the democratic process do its job.
So actually check what you're saying before you piss all over yourself.
Post a Comment